<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>User Centred &#187; User research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usercentred.net/category/user-experience/user-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usercentred.net</link>
	<description>Giorgio Venturi and the design of user-centred, mobile experiences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:09:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A remote change for user research?</title>
		<link>http://www.usercentred.net/2008/11/27/a-remote-change-for-user-research/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usercentred.net/2008/11/27/a-remote-change-for-user-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 15:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio Venturi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[User research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote usability testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote user research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usercentred.net/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
What happens when we can carry out user research and testing remotely? Do we need to change the way we work?
<p> The answer to this question is: &#8220;No&#8220;.</p>
<p>I recently had a chance of carrying out a research and usability testing consulting for a keyword research service based here in London. This experience led me to many <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.usercentred.net/2008/11/27/a-remote-change-for-user-research/">A remote change for user research?</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usercentred.net/2008/11/27/a-remote-change-for-user-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why doing user research first is right</title>
		<link>http://www.usercentred.net/2008/07/16/why-doing-user-observations-first-is-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usercentred.net/2008/07/16/why-doing-user-observations-first-is-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio Venturi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[User research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usercentred.net/2008/03/16/why-doing-user-observations-first-is-right/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have found an interesting column from Donald Norman about how the role of user research in the software/web development process, though I have to say that I find the premise of his quite contentiious. I agree with him when he says that lengthy, time-consuming field work must take place before the project starts, but even with the ball running and in a limited time frame it is possible to know a lot about the users. <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.usercentred.net/2008/07/16/why-doing-user-observations-first-is-right/">Why doing user research first is right</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usercentred.net/2008/07/16/why-doing-user-observations-first-is-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
